ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2026
Human ex vivo comparison of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide-induced immune responses and cefiderocol effects in whole blood.
Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune dysregulation is central in bacterial sepsis with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of gram-negative bacteria acting as a key component in innate immune activation. Modulation of the host response by potential immunomodulatory agents may confer benefits. This ex vivo study compared cytokine responses induced by E. coli and P. aeruginosa LPS and evaluated the impact of cefiderocol on LPS-induced immune activation in human whole blood. Whole blood from ten healthy volunteers was stimulated ex vivo with E. coli or P. aeruginosa LPS in the presence or absence of cefiderocol and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. Plasma concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-α, IFN-γ, and IL-8 were quantified at 0 h, 2 h, and 4 h using a multiplex immunoassay. Cytokine release was significantly higher after E. coli LPS stimulation than with P. aeruginosa LPS across all analytes. Mean TNF-α area under the curve (AUC₀-₄) was 2379 pg*h/mL with cefiderocol vs 1936 pg*h/mL without (percent difference 18.2% [95% CI, 5.9-31.4]) after E. coli LPS stimulation, and 278 pg/mL vs 242 pg*h/mL (12.9% [4.3-21.5]) after P. aeruginosa LPS stimulation. For IL-6, cefiderocol slightly increased AUC₀-₄ following E. coli LPS stimulation (4584 vs 3635 pg*h/mL; 20.7% [8.3-33.0]) but not with P. aeruginosa LPS (184 vs 201 pg*h/mL; - 9.3% [- 53.7-35.2]). IL-1β, IL-10, IFN-α, IFN-γ, and IL-8 levels were mostly unaffected by cefiderocol. Cefiderocol did not suppress cytokine release in human whole blood. In this study, E. coli LPS elicited a stronger immune response than P. aeruginosa LPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.