Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507331›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2026

Caring for Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Best Practices for Aligning Patient Fitness and Preference with Available Therapies.

Stephanie Franco, Christopher Wanjiku, Daniel R Richardson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie Franco *Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Christopher Wanjiku *Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Daniel R RichardsonDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA. daniel_richardson@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9310-5773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major advances in drug development and supportive care have led to a paradigm shift in the management of many of the aspects of clinical care for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia. The development of validated geriatric assessments now enable clinicians to personalize treatment recommendations based on function, frailty, and fitness. The emergence of novel theory-driven methods to capture patient preferences has further enabled clinical teams to personalize therapy recommendations to what matters most to patients. Despite increasing excitement in the field created by the introduction of these new therapies and supportive care interventions, outcomes for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remain very poor. Even with the best available therapies, median survival for most older adults is tragically short at around 15 months. Five-year survival for adults over the age of 75 years is profoundly low, below 10%. For many patients, current therapies fail to dramatically extend life or improve the quality of life. These stark realities must inform clinical decision making and fuel further research. This review critically examines current treatment options including recently approved targeted agents in the upfront and relapsed setting including FLT3 inhibitors, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 inhibitors, and the newly approved menin inhibitors. We review the use of geriatric assessments and validated screening tools to characterize patient fitness and frailty beyond clinician-graded measures. We also introduce theory-driven preference assessments that are increasingly being used to capture patient treatment outcome priorities.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcutePatient PreferenceAgedGeriatric AssessmentHumansQuality of LifeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.