Evidence mapPaperPMID 42507441Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Cardiovascular Risk Factor Prevalence and Control by Education Strata in Older Adults in 3 Countries.

Ralph Lawton, David M Cutler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ralph LawtonGraduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
David M CutlerDepartment of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Improvements in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality have plateaued in the US and have increased among adults with fewer years of education, a pattern not seen in peer countries. Differences in health system performance managing CVD risk factors may be important in this disparity. Objective: To compare cardiovascular disease risk factor prevalence and management in the US, England, and South Korea over time and by education strata. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a serial cross-sectional study used nationally representative data from adults 50 years or older from 3 countries during years ranging from 1998 to 2020. Data were analyzed from May 2025 to April 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: For each risk factor (cholesterol, blood pressure, and diabetes), the share at risk, the care cascade, and the share with uncontrolled risk were measured. Results: This study assessed data from 120 678 adults (mean [SD] age, 63.5 [9.9] years; No. [weighted %], 54 167 [46%] male and 66 511 [54%] female). For each risk factor, the US (n = 27 327) had higher shares at risk than England (n = 41 986) or South Korea (n = 51 365). For example, England had a smaller proportion at risk: 52% in period 4 (mean [SE], 11.1 [1.6] percentage points [pp] lower than in the US). Cholesterol risk in South Korea increased from 46% in 2005 to 2008 to 51% in 2015 to 2020 (P for trend < .001), with levels ultimately similar to England but 12.1 (1.1) pp below the US. US patients at risk were more likely to be aware, treated, and have controlled risk using medications, resulting in more similar uncontrolled risk across countries. Because of higher control of condition risks in the US, the rates of uncontrolled cholesterol risk in the US and England were both 29% (mean [SE] difference, <0.1 [1.5] pp), and the rate uncontrolled in South Korea was 2.2 (1.0) pp higher than the US despite higher at-risk rates. South Korea achieved rapid gains in treatment and control, especially hypertension (6% controlled in 1998-2001 to 42% in 2005-2008, P for trend < .001) and cholesterol (6% controlled in 2005-2008 to 31% in 2015-2020, P for trend < .001). Across countries, risk was higher among adults without a college degree, but control rates among those at risk were similar by education strata. Diabetes risk increased substantially over time (15% to 22% in the US, 9% to 10% in England, and 13% to 19% in South Korea, P for trend < .001), whereas cholesterol and hypertension risk remained stable or decreased. Conclusions and Relevance: In this repeated cross-sectional study of adults aged 50 years and older in the US, England, and South Korea, despite higher baseline risk, the US health system achieved comparable or better performance than England and South Korea in managing CVD risk factors. Differences in risk factor treatment did not explain disparities by country or education strata, suggesting that upstream risk accumulation, rather than care delivery, may be associated with increasing disparities in CVD risk.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesEducational StatusHeart Disease Risk FactorsAgedCholesterolCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusEnglandFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRepublic of KoreaRisk FactorsCholesterol

Identifiers

PMID42507441
PMCPMC13409021

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.