Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507669›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A standardized imaging and analysis workflow for quantitative evaluation of cutaneous neurofibromas in Nf1-KO mice.

Laura Fertitta, Fanny Coulpier, Layna Oubrou, Xavier Decrouy, Etienne Audureau, Nicolas Ortonne, Pierre Wolkenstein, Piotr Topilko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura FertittaDepartment of Dermatology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Referral center for Neurofibromatosis (CERENEF), Creteil, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3528-9804
Fanny CoulpierSTEM REPAIR NF Team, Inserm U955, Mondor Institute for Biomedical Research (IMRB), Creteil, France.
Layna OubrouSTEM REPAIR NF Team, Inserm U955, Mondor Institute for Biomedical Research (IMRB), Creteil, France.
Xavier DecrouyImaging Plateform, Mondor Institute for Biomedical Research (IMRB), Creteil, France.
Etienne AudureauPublic Health Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Creteil, France.
Nicolas OrtonneSTEM REPAIR NF Team, Inserm U955, Mondor Institute for Biomedical Research (IMRB), Creteil, France.
Pierre WolkensteinDepartment of Dermatology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Referral center for Neurofibromatosis (CERENEF), Creteil, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-457X
Piotr TopilkoSTEM REPAIR NF Team, Inserm U955, Mondor Institute for Biomedical Research (IMRB), Creteil, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder in which cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) represent one of the most common and burdensome manifestations. No approved pharmacological treatment exists. Preclinical studies are essential to evaluate candidate therapies, but reliable outcome and endpoint measures for cNFs in animal models remain limited. We developed and validated a standardized methodology to assess drug efficacy in the Prss56Cre Nf1-KO mouse model which recapitulates key features of cNFs. In this model, Nf1 inactivation and tdTomato (Tom) reporter expression were specifically targeted to Schwann cells (SCs) responsible for cNF development. This approach enables real-time monitoring, isolation, and manipulation of tumor SCs at any time. We defined macroscopic (tumor count, total Tom+ fluorescent surface area, fluorescence intensity) and microscopic (cell-type composition defined by immunolabeling with a panel of specific markers, area quantification) endpoints, developed dedicated ImageJ scripts for automated image analysis, and compared the results with those obtained using the conventional manual method. Both automated measurements showed excellent reproducibility (ICC = 1) and strong correlation with manual analysis (Spearman's coefficient > 0.90), while significantly reducing analysis time (up to 100-fold faster). Bland-Altman analyses confirmed the absence of systematic bias compared with manual scoring. The standardized image naming and metadata integration further facilitated data consolidation and statistical analysis. This validated approach provides a reliable, reproducible, and time-efficient framework for evaluating drug effects on cNFs in preclinical studies. It establishes a foundation for robust efficacy testing of candidate therapies, facilitates cross-study comparability, and accelerates therapeutic development and clinical translation.

Indexed as

NeurofibromaNeurofibromatosis 1Neurofibromin 1Skin NeoplasmsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceMice, KnockoutReproducibility of ResultsSchwann CellsWorkflowNeurofibromin 1

Identifiers

PMID42507669
PMCPMC13405064

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.