ArticleNature communications2026
Competitive resource allocation drives asynchronous and rapid nuclear multiplication in the malaria parasite.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Competitive resource allocation drives asynchronous and rapid nuclear multiplication in the malaria parasite.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The unicellular malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum proliferates within red blood cells of its human host, where it generates approximately 20 new parasites within a two-day developmental cycle. Before cellularization and release of the daughter cells, the nuclei multiply in a shared cytoplasm. In stark contrast to highly synchronized nuclear division cycles seen in other developing eukaryotes, Plasmodium nuclear cycles desynchronize rapidly. Combining live-cell imaging with biophysical modeling, we elucidate the mechanism of desynchronization and study its impact on parasite proliferation. We find that standard models of autonomous nuclear cycles cannot account for the experimental data, and therefore desynchronization requires nuclear coupling. Competition for a limiting pool of proteins needed for DNA replication explains the data, provided that they are allocated sequentially to individual nuclei. Sequential allocation can be achieved by reversible but stable association of the resources with DNA. Remarkably, the resultant asynchronous nuclear cycles accelerate parasite proliferation by minimizing idling times of the resource. This mechanism may be a general strategy to maximize proliferation in suboptimal growth conditions. Together, our findings identify nuclear cycle asynchrony as a resource-efficient means to achieve rapid proliferation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.