ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2026
Dose matters: haploinsufficiency in osteogenesis imperfecta.
Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta is a common genetic disorder of syndromic bone fragility manifesting in types with variable skeletal and extraskeletal severity. Over the past decades, the deforming types have almost exclusively received all scientific attention, leaving large knowledge gaps about the prevalent osteogenesis imperfecta type 1. However, studies within the past 5 years reveal serious unrecognized aspects of disease burden in this large patient population that contrast with osteogenesis imperfecta type 1's widely adopted classification as mild osteogenesis imperfecta. These patients present distinct clinical and molecular features, necessitating personalized clinical approaches and dedicated research. To our knowledge, this Review addresses this distinct patient group by recognizing the diverse facets of clinical burden, genetic landscape, bone pathophysiology, disease models and emerging treatment options. Owing to their later diagnosis, disease invisibility, increased mobility and uncharted clinical course compared with patients who have other types of osteogenesis imperfecta, these patients and their treating physicians face distinct healthcare and diagnostic challenges. In contrast to other patients with osteogenesis imperfecta with broader genetic causes, they are primarily characterized by molecular uniformity in the form of collagen type I deficiency. The scarcity of animal and cell models has also contributed to the lack of initiatives to explore osteogenesis imperfecta type 1. This Review aims to break this vicious cycle of osteogenesis imperfecta type 1 obscurity by defining knowledge gaps that future investigations of this disease should aim to address.
Identifiers
42509337What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.