ArticleNpj biological timing and sleep2026
Sleep and light ecologies of parents with young infants: descriptive findings from the SUNSHINE project.
Article in Npj biological timing and sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interplay between sleep, light exposure, and circadian rhythms is critical for health, yet it remains inadequately described in the everyday lives of parents with young infants. Prior work has focused mainly on mothers, the early postpartum period, and short-term assessments, leaving a limited understanding of everyday parental ecologies. To address these gaps, we conducted a 2-week observation study in both mothers and fathers of infants aged 3-9 months, simultaneously measuring sleep and light exposure using wearable actigraphy and light sensors alongside sleep diaries. Our descriptive approach aimed to characterize real-life patterns of sleep and light, quantify their variability across nights and individuals, and explore differences by infant age, parental role, and contextual factors. We found that while sleep duration was generally adequate, nights were frequently fragmented, with multiple awakenings and substantial variability across individuals and nights. Light exposure during waking hours was predominantly dim, and brief exposures to light during sleep episodes were common. Seasonal variation, infant sleep location, and caregiving roles may have shaped sleep-light patterns. These findings highlight the complexity and heterogeneity of sleep and light ecologies in early parenthood, and underscore the value of wearable monitoring and descriptive profiling for informing circadian-aware interventions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.