ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Video-based artificial intelligence for automated neonatal respiratory monitoring.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal respiratory monitoring is essential for the early detection of clinical alterations, especially in preterm newborns. Conventional methods are limited by subjectivity and the use of contact sensors. This experimental technological development study was conducted according to the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) guidelines. A computer vision-based system was developed: a fine-tuned YOLO11 model segmented the thoracoabdominal region of interest, the respiratory signal was extracted by optical-flow analysis of thoracoabdominal motion, and the respiratory rate was estimated by detrending and automatic peak detection; pose-based movement detection restricted the estimation to periods when the infant was still. The study was approved under protocols No. 4,744,993, 4,699,000, and 3,232,698 and classified as Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 5-6. Twenty-three neonatal recordings were included, comprising 3387 manually annotated frames for segmentation-model training and evaluation. At the time of recording, the newborns were between 3 and 15 days of postnatal age, had a postmenstrual age between 37 and 40 weeks, and were breathing spontaneously in room air. The sample consisted of neonates with a gestational age of 33 ± 1.76 weeks and weight of 1741.69 ± 393.97 g. Apgar scores were 7 ± 1.0 and 8 ± 1.0 at the 1st and 5th minutes, respectively. Fifty percent were female, and 75% were delivered by cesarean section. The system demonstrated robust thoracoabdominal segmentation with mean average precision (mAP) > 94% and continuous pose tracking. Respiratory dynamics analysis enabled respiratory-rate estimation during stable periods, with consistent performance supporting technical feasibility. The mean absolute error (MAE) was 2.1 breaths per minute (bpm) compared with the simultaneous clinical reference assessment.
conclusionThe system demonstrated technical feasibility for automated thoracoabdominal segmentation and non-contact respiratory-rate estimation during periods of neonatal stability. Given the small, single-center sample and the inclusion of newborns breathing spontaneously in room air, prospective multicenter validation is required before clinical implementation. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Neonatal respiratory monitoring still relies mainly on contact sensors and subjective clinical assessment. • Artificial intelligence and computer vision have shown potential for noninvasive neonatal monitoring, but automated respiratory analysis systems remain limited. WHAT IS NEW: • An artificial intelligence-based video system integrating YOLO and respiratory-signal analysis enabled automated neonatal respiratory monitoring. • The system identified respiratory rate during periods of neonatal stability, supporting objective and noninvasive respiratory assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.