ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Cognitive reappraisal influences the organization of emotional episodes in memory.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mosaic of experience: How individual differences in attention and working memory shape event segmentation.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2026Review
- Prediction error is out of context: The dominance of contextual stability in structuring episodic memories.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Changes in our environment help to segment continuous experience into distinct memories. For example, switching locations can cue this segmentation process and enhance long-term memory. Experiencing a wave of negative emotion can also separate memories of adjacent events, but it remains unclear whether this effect is similarly adaptive. Here, we tested whether downregulating emotional responses alters the impact of negative emotion on memory organization and whether emotion-driven segmentation is related to mental health. Participants viewed sequences of neutral objects interspersed with a single negative image and were cued to either reappraise their emotional responses or passively experience them. As expected, viewing negative images elicited segmentation, characterized by changes in temporal memory. Contrary to our hypothesis, reappraisal led to memory segmentation but in a different way: greater reductions in negative affect were associated with stronger memory separation. Across individuals, mood predicted which segmentation style prevailed, with less positive moods favoring emotion-driven memory separation. Pupillometry further revealed two distinct features of pupil dilation to negative images: one associated with passive exposure and the other with cognitive reappraisal. This latter cognitive component peaked rapidly after the negative image, suggesting that participants engaged regulatory strategies to structure their memories. Finally, individuals who showed a stronger tendency to segment memories under intense emotion also exhibited higher pupil-linked emotional arousal and reported more symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. These findings suggest that emotional memories can be segmented by competing cognitive and affective pathways, with a bias toward emotion-driven segmentation linked to poorer mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42509531What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.