ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Children's Self-Perceptions of Adequacy in and Predilection for Physical Activity (CSAPPA) Questionnaire for Primary School Children Aged 6 to 12 Years.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUnderstanding children's physical self-concept is crucial, as it influences motivation, behavior, and physical activity (PA). The Spanish version of the Children's Self-Perceptions of Adequacy in and Predilection for Physical Activity (CSAPPA) assesses the adequacy and predilection for PA, but it is not fully adapted for schoolchildren. Considering the developmental and contextual differences between children and adolescents, adapting and validating this instrument for younger populations is necessary. This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the CSAPPA for schoolchildren aged 6-12 years (65 boys and 64 girls; mean age 9.63 ± 1.78 years).
methodComprehension of the CSAPPA was examined through cognitive interviews, and reliability was assessed via a test-retest approach with 129 Spanish schoolchildren. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to evaluate validity and reliability.
resultsCFA confirmed the three-factor structure (Adequacy, Predilection, Enjoyment) in children aged 6-12, with excellent fit indices: Chi-square divided by degrees of freedom (χ
conclusionsThe Spanish CSAPPA demonstrates validity and reliability for assessing self-perceptions related to PA motivation among schoolchildren aged 6-12. As part of the affective domain in the Spanish Physical Literacy Assessment for Children (SPLA-C) model, it shows promise for use in school and sport contexts, supporting the identification of needs and planning interventions to promote active participation and positive development. However, items 8 and 14 demonstrated poor psychometric performance and should be interpreted with caution, requiring further refinement before the instrument can be recommended without reservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.