ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multimodal Non-Invasive Skin Imaging in Dermatology: Current Modalities, Clinical Applications, and Future Integration.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in the Field of Cutaneous Malignancies: Background and Clinical Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal non-invasive skin imaging combines complementary technologies, including dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT), and high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), to enable comprehensive evaluation of skin lesions across multiple spatial scales. While dermoscopy facilitates assessment of superficial morphologic features, RCM provides near-cellular resolution imaging, C-OCT and LC-OCT offer high-resolution structural visualization at greater depths, and HFUS enables evaluation of deeper tissue architecture and lesion extent. The complementary strengths of these modalities support more accurate diagnosis, disease monitoring, and treatment assessment. This review summarizes the principles, clinical applications, advantages, and limitations of major non-invasive imaging modalities, with a particular emphasis on multimodal integration. We further propose a conceptual framework for a multimodal non-invasive skin imaging center, highlighting the roles of workflow standardization, multidisciplinary collaboration, and integrated data management. Current challenges, including implementation costs, data governance, and workforce training, are also discussed. Future developments in artificial intelligence, multicenter collaboration, and imaging-based treatment monitoring are expected to further advance precision dermatology and facilitate the broader clinical adoption of multimodal skin imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.