ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Decision-Making Styles Shaping College Students' Sports and Health Consumption Preferences: Behavioral and Neurological Evidence.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the influence of decision-making styles on college students' sports and health consumption preferences and the underlying cognitive neural mechanisms, this study recruited 39 college students as participants, adopted a one-factor within-subjects design, and combined behavioral experiments with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). It examined consumption preferences and brain activation characteristics in maximizers and satisficers under three conditions: no promotion, discount promotion, and public welfare promotion. In behavioral terms, college students demonstrated the highest inclination towards public welfare promotions, with discounts being the second most favored, while the no-promotion condition received the lowest preference. Maximizers preferred discount promotion, while satisficers prioritized public welfare promotion. In neural terms, public welfare promotion widely activated the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas discount promotion only activated a local region of this cortex. Maximizers showed the strongest activation in the corresponding region under discount promotion, and satisficers exhibited more significant activation in the corresponding region under public welfare promotion. Decision-making styles shaped consumption preferences through depth of information processing and brain activation patterns: maximizers focused on rational calculation and benefit maximization, while satisficers relied on intuitive experience and value perception. These findings provide behavioral and neuroscientific evidence for precision marketing in the sport and health consumption market and the implementation of the national fitness program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.