ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
OpenSim-Umberger-Based Metabolic Power Stratification During the Sit-to-Walk Transition Using Interpretable Ensemble Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantifying metabolic cost during short transitional movements is challenging because conventional metabolic measurements have limited temporal resolution. This proof-of-concept study examined whether model-derived metabolic cost during the sit-to-walk (STW) transition could be exploratorily stratified using interpretable ensemble learning. Forty-nine healthy adults completed the STW phase of the Timed Up and Go task with synchronized three-dimensional kinematics, ground reaction forces, and eight-channel surface electromyography. Individually scaled OpenSim gait2392 models and the Umberger metabolic model were used to estimate metabolic power from seat-off to the end of the first complete gait cycle. Window-averaged metabolic power was stratified into low-, medium-, and high-cost levels. Window-level biomechanical features were extracted from kinematic, kinetic, and muscle-state time series. Seven classifiers were trained using a subject-level 7:3 train-test split and stratified five-fold cross-validation within the training set, and their probability outputs were integrated through TOPSIS-weighted classifier fusion. SHapley Additive exPlanations were used for class-specific feature attribution. The fused ensemble achieved an AUC of 0.870, F1 score of 0.703, accuracy of 0.705, and specificity of 0.853 on the independent test set. Discrimination was stronger for the low- and high-cost levels than for the medium-cost level. SHAP-based attribution highlighted force-related changes and knee-angle variability and amplitude measures as prediction-relevant biomechanical features. These findings support a model-derived, interpretable workflow for extending STW assessment from task performance to task cost, while indicating the need for further validation in larger and clinical datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.