ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Cells, Bioinstructive Scaffolds, Immunological Microenvironment, and Emerging Technologies.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focal articular cartilage defects retain limited intrinsic repair capacity owing to the avascular, alymphatic and aneural nature of hyaline cartilage. Marrow-stimulation procedures often generate mechanically inferior fibrocartilage with declining benefit within 2-5 years in larger or high-demand lesions, while matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) achieves durable 10-year benefit but remains constrained by two-stage logistics, in vitro dedifferentiation and cost. This review integrates the cellular, biomaterial, biochemical and immunological dimensions of articular cartilage tissue engineering with quantitative benchmarks and a critical reading of failure modes, scalability and regulatory standing. We benchmark MACI against single-stage chondron- and progenitor-based therapies; examine mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) from bone marrow, adipose, synovium and the infrapatellar fat pad with a mechanistic dissection of the Wnt/β-catenin, IHH-PTHrP, RUNX2/MEF2C and HIF-1α inputs driving hypertrophic drift; reframe scaffolds as bioinstructive environments delivering mechanical, biochemical and tribological cues, including stimuli-responsive and 4D-printed systems and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) as a non-invasive adjunct; develop the immunological dialogue between altered native cartilage, the infrapatellar fat pad-synovium unit and engineered constructs; and appraise CRISPR-based cell engineering and artificial-intelligence applications in biofabrication. We classify the principal approaches into four explicit translational tiers so that the evidentiary standing of each strategy is transparent. Translation will be paced by standardised potency assays, immune-aware construct design and robust long-term in vivo evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.