Evidence mapPaperPMID 42510786Full record

ReviewGenes2026

Celocentesis in Ultra-Early Prenatal Diagnosis: Diagnostic Accuracy, Safety Profile, and Emerging Therapeutic Perspectives.

Stylianos Makrydimas, Efthalia Moustakli, Nektaria Zagorianakou, Emmanouil D Oikonomou, Ioannis Mitrogiannis, George Makrydimas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stylianos MakrydimasMedical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0009-0001-9981-7488
Efthalia MoustakliDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0009-0005-3333-2620
Nektaria ZagorianakouScientific Laboratory for Innovative Technologies in Internal Medicine, Preventive Medicine and Overall Care, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0009-0001-3036-7212
Emmanouil D OikonomouHuman Computer Interaction Laboratory, Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, University of Ioannina, Kostakioi, 47150 Arta, Greece.ORCID 0009-0004-9227-1365
Ioannis MitrogiannisHarris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College London, 16-20 Windsor Walk, London SE5 8BB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3904-7175
George MakrydimasDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celocentesis represents a novel form of invasive pregnancy test that allows the genetic material of the embryo to be tested during the embryonic stage at 6-9 weeks of gestation. The purpose of this narrative review is to present the latest available literature on celocentesis, including its biological basis, technical aspects, diagnostic performance, safety profile, clinical applications, and future perspectives. Available evidence from selected studies conducted in highly specialized centers suggests that the diagnosis of monogenic diseases by celocentesis can achieve high accuracy, with reported success rates ranging from 93% to 99% when combined with molecular testing and selective fetal cell isolation. Similarly, a high level of concordance with conventional prenatal and postnatal diagnostic methods has been reported. The pregnancy loss associated with celocentesis appears to be low and comparable to baseline early pregnancy loss, although current evidence is derived primarily from observational studies and limited clinical series. One of the main benefits of celocentesis is the capability to perform prenatal diagnosis at an early stage of pregnancy, which facilitates more informed decisions about treatment options, minimizes parental anxiety, and allows earlier intervention when required. Moreover, experimental evidence suggests that celocentesis may provide a future platform for intrauterine therapeutic approaches, including stem cells and gene-based therapies, although these applications remain investigational. Despite these promising findings, celocentesis should currently be considered an experimental procedure, as its use remains largely confined to specialized centers and further multicenter studies are required to establish its safety, reproducibility, and broader clinical utility.

Indexed as

Genetic Diseases, InbornPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleHumansPregnancycoelomic fluidembryonic genetic testingfetal cell isolationintrauterine therapymaternal cell contaminationmonogenic disordersquantitative fluorescent PCR

Identifiers

PMID42510786
PMCPMC13408827

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.