ReviewGenes2026
Celocentesis in Ultra-Early Prenatal Diagnosis: Diagnostic Accuracy, Safety Profile, and Emerging Therapeutic Perspectives.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Celocentesis represents a novel form of invasive pregnancy test that allows the genetic material of the embryo to be tested during the embryonic stage at 6-9 weeks of gestation. The purpose of this narrative review is to present the latest available literature on celocentesis, including its biological basis, technical aspects, diagnostic performance, safety profile, clinical applications, and future perspectives. Available evidence from selected studies conducted in highly specialized centers suggests that the diagnosis of monogenic diseases by celocentesis can achieve high accuracy, with reported success rates ranging from 93% to 99% when combined with molecular testing and selective fetal cell isolation. Similarly, a high level of concordance with conventional prenatal and postnatal diagnostic methods has been reported. The pregnancy loss associated with celocentesis appears to be low and comparable to baseline early pregnancy loss, although current evidence is derived primarily from observational studies and limited clinical series. One of the main benefits of celocentesis is the capability to perform prenatal diagnosis at an early stage of pregnancy, which facilitates more informed decisions about treatment options, minimizes parental anxiety, and allows earlier intervention when required. Moreover, experimental evidence suggests that celocentesis may provide a future platform for intrauterine therapeutic approaches, including stem cells and gene-based therapies, although these applications remain investigational. Despite these promising findings, celocentesis should currently be considered an experimental procedure, as its use remains largely confined to specialized centers and further multicenter studies are required to establish its safety, reproducibility, and broader clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.