ReviewGenes2026
Molecular Diagnosis to Individualized Therapies in Rare Genetic Diseases: New Approach Methodologies, RNA Therapeutics, and the Case for a Human-First Filter.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- RNA-Based Therapeutics in Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Bridging Molecular Genetics and Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare genetic diseases are heterogeneous across mechanisms, trajectories, and treatment responses. To date, approved therapies remain available for only a small proportion of rare genetic diseases. Oligonucleotide-based RNA therapeutics, particularly antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), offer a promising therapeutic avenue for rare genetic diseases with sequence-level precision. However, traditional preclinical paths may mis-predict human outcomes when disease biology diverges from animal models. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), organoid models, and clinical-trials-in-a-dish (CTiD), aim to bring human biology earlier into the translational pipeline. NAMs enable variant-to-function studies, efficacy screening, and safety triage at clinically relevant speed and scale. While critics argue that NAMs are unvalidated and cannot replace preclinical animal models, proponents report that they are increasingly able to recapitulate human phenotypes and predict clinical liabilities, although their predictive validity remains context-dependent. Here, a front-loaded human filter refers to the use of human-derived systems early in development to support mechanistic interpretation, candidate prioritization, and early liability assessment before broader nonclinical evaluation. Recent studies pairing NAMs with ASOs support rapid, patient-specific preclinical screening in selected settings, while also showing the need for broader evidence on delivery, pharmacology, safety, and clinical relevance. This review places these developments within the translational realities of oligonucleotide-based therapeutics, including model fidelity, ASO chemistry and optimization, delivery challenges, pharmacology, regulatory pathways for individualized ASOs, and accessibility. We also propose a pragmatic validation framework to assess the scientific and translational credibility of NAMs across rare genetic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.