Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42510974›Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2026

Pipettes and Pipelines: The Weapons of Omics Sciences for a New Age of Clinical Studies.

Ícaro S Lopes, Eduardo R Fukutani, Tiago F Mota, Bruno B Andrade, Mariana Araújo-Pereira, Artur T L Queiroz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ícaro S LopesLaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica e Translacional, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador 40296-710, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8116-7766
Eduardo R FukutaniLaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica e Translacional, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador 40296-710, Brazil.
Tiago F MotaThe Genios Lab, Multinational Organization Network Sponsoring Translational and Epidemiological Research (MONSTER) Initiative, Salvador 41720-200, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6575-8208
Bruno B AndradeLaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica e Translacional, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador 40296-710, Brazil.
Mariana Araújo-PereiraLaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica e Translacional, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador 40296-710, Brazil.
Artur T L QueirozLaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica e Translacional, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador 40296-710, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-9993

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia 440/2023National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 33/2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The omics sciences represent a revolution for clinical studies, offering integrative approaches to analyzing biological data with unprecedented depth. From the discovery of the double-helix structure of DNA to the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing tool, passing through the evolution of sequencing platforms and the exponential advance of computing power and in silico tools, omics has progressed in its role of leading innovative solutions for old challenges in health sciences. In this review, we describe different omics, the history of their techniques and technologies, data analysis and up-to-date visualization tools used for clinical data in research and health systems. We also discuss how omics are currently being applied in diagnosis, precision and personalized medicine. For the future, omics vow to underpin the majority of decisions made by health professionals, allowing individualized treatments based on Big Data and personal biological information.

Indexed as

clinical studiesomicsreview

Identifiers

PMID42510974
PMCPMC13409061

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.