Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511022›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Modular Revision of a Failed Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Scapulo-Humeral Endoprosthesis in a Dog with Proximal Humeral Osteosarcoma: First Clinical Communication.

Usov Stanislav Yuryevich, Gaetano Principato, Marco Tabbì, Marco Currenti, Girolamo Messina, Ekaterina Burkhan, Francesco Macrì, Enrico Panichi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Usov Stanislav YuryevichLenOblVet, Multidisciplinary Veterinary Centre, Kolpino, 196653 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Gaetano PrincipatoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-7159-7308
Marco TabbìDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-1404-7280
Marco CurrentiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy.
Girolamo MessinaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy.
Ekaterina BurkhanBonabyte, Begovoy Proezd 7, 119421 Moscow, Russia.
Francesco MacrìDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4846-2581
Enrico PanichiCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico Veterinario (CTOVET), 16011 Arenzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine appendicular osteosarcoma (OSA) is typically managed by limb amputation. However, this approach may be suboptimal in dogs with concurrent osteoarthrosis (OA). Limb-sparing surgery using three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific implants (PSIs) may be an alternative, although evidence on implant durability and revision strategies remains limited, in particular for proximal humeral reconstructions. This report describes a 9-year-old, overweight dog referred for a 4-week history of persistent left forelimb lameness. Computed tomography (CT) confirmed a lesion affecting the proximal humerus and severe bilateral hip OA. Fine-needle aspiration cytology supported a presumptive diagnosis of OSA. Limb-sparing surgery with 3D-printed PSIs was chosen instead of amputation due to overweight status and OA. Patient-specific guides (PSGs) and endoprosthesis (PSE) were designed based on preoperative CT. Histopathology of the resected tumour confirmed OSA with complete surgical margins. Postoperative functional recovery was favorable, with progressive return to weight-bearing and mild residual lameness up to 8 months. At 9 months, implant failure occurred due to fracture at the distal humeral fixation region. Revision surgery was performed using a novel 3D-printed modular PSE integrating the retained proximal component, allowing restoration of limb function for an additional 6 months. The dog was euthanized at 15 months due to pulmonary metastases. Post-mortem macroscopic and histological visual semi-quantitative assessment of peri-implant tissue suggested advanced osseointegration, with no local recurrence or infection. This report suggests that PSI-based limb-sparing reconstruction may be feasible in proximal humeral OSA and highlights mechanical fatigue as a key limitation. The modular revision approach suggests the potential of additive manufacturing for salvage strategies after implant failure.

Indexed as

3D-printinglimb-sparingmodular implantosteosarcomapatient-specific endoprosthesispatient-specific guidesrevision surgery

Identifiers

PMID42511022
PMCPMC13405986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.