Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511394›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Entropy, Inhibition and Memory in Balanced Spiking Reservoirs.

Luigi Rosati, Nicola Toschi, Andrea Duggento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luigi RosatiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-7585-4105
Nicola ToschiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1929-5833
Andrea DuggentoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6030-5269

Funding

European Innovation Council GA101070908European Innovation Council GA101099355Ministry of Universities and Research FISA-2022-00899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent neural networks are studied along two largely parallel tracks: as machine-learning models evaluated by task performance and as computational-neuroscience models of cortical circuits evaluated by dynamical realism. Reservoir computing offers a meeting point, yet the link between dynamical regime and computational performance has not been systematically mapped in biologically constrained spiking architectures. We treat the Brunel balanced excitatory-inhibitory network as a reservoir and characterize separation capacity (kernel quality) and transient memory (corrected linear memory capacity, validated by non-parametric mutual information) across the full phase diagram. The analysis uses a four-state Markov source whose Shannon entropy rate is set in closed form by a single parameter at fixed marginal entropy. Both capabilities increase monotonically with the inhibitory ratio

Indexed as

Brunel networkreservoir computingRNNspiking neural networks

Identifiers

PMID42511394
PMCPMC13409623

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.