ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Molecular Pathways of Cardiometabolic Residual Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: Insulin Resistance, Metaflammation, and Liver-Kidney-Vascular Crosstalk.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiometabolic residual risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) persists despite major advances in glucose-lowering therapy, lipid management, blood pressure control, weight reduction, and organ-protective strategies. This residual burden should not be interpreted solely as the consequence of incomplete achievement of conventional therapeutic targets, but rather as the clinical expression of persistent molecular activity involving multiple interconnected organs and pathways. Insulin resistance, metaflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, lipotoxicity, endothelial impairment, hepatic metabolic dysregulation, renal inflammation, fibrotic remodeling, and metabolic memory interact within a dynamic network linking adipose tissue, liver, kidney, immune cells, and vasculature. In this review, we discuss the biochemical and molecular drivers of cardiometabolic residual risk in T2D, with particular emphasis on impaired insulin receptor substrate/PI3K/Akt signaling, stress-kinase activation, NLRP3 inflammasome priming and assembly, MASLD-related lipotoxicity and fibrogenesis, podocyte and tubular injury, endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling, AGE-RAGE signaling, and thrombo-inflammatory vascular injury. These pathways explain why biological vulnerability may persist even when conventional clinical parameters appear adequately controlled. We also examine the role of translational biomarkers and simple clinical indices, including TyG-derived indices, adiposity markers, hepatic steatosis and fibrosis scores, albuminuria, eGFR, and lipid-related markers, as accessible windows into active biological pathways. Finally, we review how contemporary therapeutic strategies may modulate selected components of this residual-risk network. A pathway-centered interpretation of T2D may support more precise residual-risk phenotyping and help move cardiometabolic care beyond isolated target control toward mechanism-based prevention. This review further links these mechanisms to the contemporary cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) framework, as defined by the 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN CKM Guideline, and disaggregates the underlying molecular network into organ-specific pathway cascades that make the causal relationships between metabolic, inflammatory, hepatic, renal, and vascular injury more explicit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.