ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Microfluidic Platforms for Exosome Engineering: Scalable Therapeutics for Cancer Immunotherapy and Infectious Diseases.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), particularly small EVs or exosomes, are promising cell-free therapeutics with superior biocompatibility and intrinsic targeting for synthetic nanoparticles. However, conventional bulk preparation methods suffer from low yield, poor reproducibility, and structural instability. Microfluidic technologies resolve these issues by enabling precise, automated, and low-shear fluidic manipulation. This mini-review highlights recent advances in microfluidic-engineered exosomes for cancer immunotherapy and infectious diseases. We evaluate critical microfluidic strategies for isolation, surface engineering, and cargo loading, contrasting platforms like ExoArc, acoustofluidics, cellular nanoporation, and electroporation. Particular emphasis is placed on complex modalities, including immune cell-derived exosomes (IEX), neo-antigen presentation, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-derived exosomes, and targeted siRNA delivery networks. Crucially, we analyze the technological disconnect between analytical microfluidic scales and massive therapeutic manufacturing volumes, addressing how physical forces risk damaging conformationally sensitive surface proteins (e.g., CAR scFv). Finally, we outline future perspectives, including high-throughput 3D-multiplexed networks, stimulus-responsive scarless elution, and integrated "sample-to-therapy" circuits. Guided by the MISEV2023 guidelines, this review frames the path toward standardized, clinical-scale engineering of multi-functional, cell-free immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.