Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511649›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Synaptic vs. Non-Synaptic Glycine Receptors: Physiological Role and Implications in Alzheimer's Disease Pathology.

Eva Kiss, Joachim Kirsch, Stefan Kins, Jochen Kuhse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva KissDepartment of Genetics, Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mures, 540142 Târgu Mures, Romania.
Joachim KirschInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan KinsDepartment of Human Biology and Human Genetics, University of Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7231-4872
Jochen KuhseInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4140-0487

Funding

Ministry of Research and Innovation PN-III-P4-PCE-2021-1089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors (GlyRs) are pentameric ligand-gated chloride channels that mediate fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the central nervous system (CNS), with high expression in the spinal cord, brainstem, cerebellum, and retina. Beyond traditional postsynaptic phasic inhibition, emerging evidence highlights the importance of extrasynaptic GlyRs-expressed in both neuronal and non-neuronal cells-in mediating tonic inhibition by sensing ambient glycine levels, including in the forebrain. These non-synaptic receptors display high agonist affinity, unique subunit compositions, and distinct pharmacodynamics. Notably, recent studies have begun to implicate aberrant GlyR signaling in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology; however, its functional role in this specific neurodegenerative context remains only poorly understood. This review synthesizes the molecular properties and functional significance of these diverse GlyR populations, emphasizing their involvement in calcium signaling, inhibitory tone, and neural circuit modulation, while critically evaluating their emerging therapeutic potential in AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseReceptors, GlycineSynapsesAnimalsGlycineHumansSynaptic TransmissionGlycineReceptors, GlycineAlzheimer’s diseaseextrasynaptic GlyRsneuroprotectionphasic vs. tonic inhibition

Identifiers

PMID42511649
PMCPMC13410934

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.