ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Ion Torrent Genexus as a Fast and Reliable Solution for HIV-1 Drug Resistance Testing: Comparison with the GeneStudio S5 Workflow.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has improved HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing (GRT) by enabling the detection of minority drug-resistance variants, although interpretation of low-frequency mutations remains challenging because of sequencing artifacts. This study compared the analytical performance and workflow efficiency of two Ion Torrent platforms, GeneStudio S5 (S5) and Genexus (GX), for routine HIV-1 GRT. A total of 134 plasma samples from people with HIV were prospectively collected, and 100 samples successfully sequenced on both platforms were included in the comparative analysis. Overall concordance for resistance-associated mutations was 88.0%, with agreement rates of 97.0% for protease, 90.0% for reverse transcriptase, and 100% for integrase. Both platforms generated clinically interpretable resistance profiles; however, 13 discordant mutations were identified. Application of a standardized confirmation algorithm, integrating Stanford HIVdb analysis with manual read-level inspection in Geneious software (version 2025.2.2), reclassified several discordant mutations as low-confidence or non-confirmed variants. Operationally, GX provided a fully automated workflow with approximately 24 h turnaround time and minimal hands-on processing, whereas S5 required approximately 72 h and substantially greater operator involvement. These findings support both platforms for routine HIV-1 GRT while emphasizing the importance of standardized bioinformatic review for reliable variant interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.