ReviewCancers2026
The Evolving Role of Bispecific Antibodies in Oncogene-Driven NSCLC.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic class in oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), designed to simultaneously target multiple signaling pathways and overcome resistance mechanisms associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Unlike small-molecule TKIs, bsAbs enable dual receptor blockade and immune effector engagement, offering a mechanistically distinct advantage in the context of tumor heterogeneity and bypass signaling. This review summarizes the structural and biological principles underlying bsAb design, with a focus on clinically approved agents such as amivantamab (EGFR/MET) and zenocutuzumab (HER2/HER3) and a growing pipeline of investigational agents. We evaluate key clinical evidence from Phase I-III trials including CHRYSALIS, PAPILLON, MARIPOSA, MARIPOSA-2 and eNRGy, and compare the efficacy, toxicity, and CNS penetration profile of bsAbs relative to TKIs and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). While bsAbs demonstrate meaningful clinical activity, particularly in TKI-resistant disease and molecularly defined subsets such as EGFR exon 20 insertions and NRG1 fusions, their limitations, including intravenous administration, increased immune-mediated and thromboembolic toxicity, currently preclude replacement of TKIs in most settings. Collectively, available evidence supports a complementary role for bsAbs within evolving multimodal treatment paradigms, particularly in combination strategies. Future directions include biomarker-driven patient selection, improved drug engineering and integration into adaptive therapeutic sequencing frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.