Evidence mapPaperPMID 42512385Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Exogenous Heat Shock Proteins in Oncology: Biological Roles and Clinical Implications.

Alexandra Sokolenko, Thiago Gomes Heck, Elena Mikhailova, Lilian Corrêa Costa Beber, Bruna Steffler, Mirna Stela Ludwig, Huile Gao, Maxim Shevtsov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra SokolenkoDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology, Saint-Petersburg State Institute of Technology, 190013 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0009-0000-4454-8148
Thiago Gomes HeckDepartment of Life Sciences, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Ijuí 98700-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1242-5423
Elena MikhailovaLaboratory of Biomedical Nanotechnologies, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8576-3717
Lilian Corrêa Costa BeberDepartment of Life Sciences, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Ijuí 98700-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7796-1641
Bruna StefflerDepartment of Life Sciences, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Ijuí 98700-000, Brazil.
Mirna Stela LudwigDepartment of Life Sciences, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Ijuí 98700-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0300-1511
Huile GaoKey Laboratory of Drug-Targeting and Drug Delivery System of the Education Ministry, Sichuan Engineering Laboratory for Plant-Sourced Drug and Sichuan Research Center for Drug Precision Industrial Technology, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5355-7238
Maxim ShevtsovLaboratory of Biomedical Nanotechnologies, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-2239

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG funding programme Open Access Publishing
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat shock proteins (HSPs), particularly HSP70 and HSP90, are highly conserved molecular chaperones that protect cells from a wide range of stressors and maintain proteome homeostasis. In cancer, tumor cells frequently overexpress and actively release HSPs into the extracellular space and circulation in response to metabolic alterations, hypoxia, oxidative stress, and therapeutic interventions. Consequently, circulating HSP levels are often elevated in patients with malignancies compared with healthy individuals. This review summarizes current evidence on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive value of circulating HSPs in both solid and hematological cancers. Clinical studies indicate that circulating HSP concentrations are associated with tumor type, disease stage, lymph node involvement, metastatic burden, treatment response, and risk of recurrence. Importantly, membrane-associated and extracellular vesicle-associated forms of HSP70 appear to exhibit greater tumor specificity than freely circulating proteins, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate analytical approaches for biomarker assessment. Beyond their utility as biomarkers, extracellular HSPs actively participate in tumor biology and anti-tumor immunity. Depending on the cellular and immunological context, they can either support tumor progression or stimulate immune responses through activation of natural killer cells, antigen-presenting cells, and cross-presentation of tumor-derived antigens. These immunomodulatory properties have provided the foundation for the development of HSP-based vaccines and adoptive immunotherapeutic strategies, several of which have demonstrated encouraging results in clinical trials. We further discuss the relationship between extracellular chaperone biology and responses to major anticancer treatments, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, HSP90-targeted therapies, and immune checkpoint blockade. In conclusion, the available evidence supports circulating extracellular HSPs as promising non-invasive biomarkers and potential pharmacodynamic indicators that may improve patient stratification, treatment monitoring, and prediction of therapeutic efficacy in clinical oncology.

Indexed as

biomarkercancer therapychaperonescirculating HSPheat shock proteinsHSP70HSP90

Identifiers

PMID42512385
PMCPMC13406738

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.