ReviewCancers2026
Pharmacologic Resistance in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Translational Therapeutic Strategies.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas are rare, biologically diverse mesenchymal malignancies in which pharmacologic resistance cannot be explained by a single unifying mechanism. In this narrative review, resistance is conceptualized as a dynamic, multilayered process shaped by histologic subtype, genomic architecture, transcriptional plasticity, the tumor microenvironment, and treatment-driven selective pressure. Resistance to conventional chemotherapy arises through both intrinsic and acquired mechanisms, including altered drug transport and metabolism, enhanced DNA damage responses, impaired apoptotic signaling, clonal selection, and the emergence of therapy-persistent cellular states. By contrast, resistance to targeted and epigenetic therapies more often reflects adaptive bypass signaling, lineage reprogramming, and incomplete identification of subtype-specific dependencies than secondary on-target alterations alone. The tumor microenvironment further contributes to therapeutic failure through hypoxia, extracellular matrix-mediated barriers, abnormal vascularization, myeloid-dominant immunosuppression, and immune exclusion, thereby helping explain the modest and histology-dependent activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in soft tissue sarcoma. This review also differentiates baseline predictive biomarkers from dynamic resistance-monitoring tools, underscoring the potential-despite still limited clinical maturity-of pharmacogenomic markers, immune signatures, tertiary lymphoid structures, circulating tumor DNA, and circulating methylation-based approaches. Finally, emerging strategies to overcome resistance are examined, including mechanism-based combinations, biomarker-guided treatment selection, synthetic lethality, functional precision platforms, and adaptive histology-specific trial designs. Collectively, these observations support a view of resistance in soft tissue sarcoma as a context-dependent biological process that demands integrated, subtype-aware, and translationally grounded therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.