ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Surgical Procedures Used in the Treatment of Postoperative Acute Pancreatitis Grade C After Pancreatoduodenectomy-A Narrative Review.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis grade C (PPAP-C) is the most severe grade of this complication, associated with the highest mortality rate after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Most PPAP-C cases require surgical intervention. However, no treatment guidelines for PPAP-C have been established. Literature reports are largely based on the coexistence of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade C (POPF-C) and PPAP-C, with similar surgical treatment methods. However, in PPAP-C, the evolution of inflammation can vary in course and severity: from necrosis limited to the anastomotic line to extensive necrosis involving the entire pancreatic parenchyma. In this narrative review, we summarize the surgical techniques proposed for PPAP-C treatment and attempt to create a decision-making algorithm for optimizing the choice of surgical treatment for PPAP-C depending on the extent of pancreatic necrosis and the patient's general condition after PD. Our retrospective review is largely based on retrospective evidence and contains an inevitable selection bias. According to the cited literature, in cases of limited necrosis, parenchyma-sparing methods show an advantage over completion pancreatectomy. However, the complete pancreatic removal is usually performed in the initially more advanced cases or as a second choice when the pancreas-preserving methods fail. Therefore, the superiority of any approach cannot be clearly determined. More studies and uniform guidelines for optimal PPAP-C treatment are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.