ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Female Oncofertility in Colorectal Cancer: Reproductive Uncertainties and Potential Benefits of Immunotherapy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early-onset colorectal cancer is increasing, making reproductive health an increasingly relevant survivorship issue. While immune checkpoint inhibitors have altered the management of deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) colorectal cancer, their implications for reproductive-age women remain insufficiently defined. We performed a focused narrative review, structured in line with the SANRA framework, to clarify this specific clinical domain. Immunotherapy may reshape female oncofertility counseling through two distinct mechanisms: direct reproductive uncertainty, including established endocrine toxicities and hypothesized, but currently unproven, direct gonadal effects; and indirect pathway-modifying effects, such as the potential avoidance of pelvic radiotherapy or radical surgery in selected patients with locally advanced dMMR/MSI-H rectal cancer. Anatomical organ preservation should not be automatically equated with functional fertility preservation. The key clinical message is that reproductive counseling should not be restricted to historically gonadotoxic chemotherapy. Instead, early multidisciplinary guidance should explicitly distinguish CRC-specific evidence from extrapolated or theoretical concerns, integrate fertility preservation strategies when clinically feasible, and address pelvic and sexual health, contraception, washout, endocrine follow-up, and future pregnancy planning. Until prospective CRC-specific reproductive data become available, immunotherapy should not be presented as either reproductively neutral or fertility-preserving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.