ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Bleeding Risk Assessment and Management.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bleeding is one of the most common and feared complications after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is associated with longer hospital stays, higher mortality, and worse clinical outcomes. As the number of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) continues to grow, preventing bleeding has become an important part of PCI management. This practical review summarizes current evidence on how to assess bleeding risk and reduce bleeding before, during, and after PCI. Several tools, including the BARC classification, ARC-HBR criteria, PRECISE-DAPT, and DAPT scores, help identify patients who may benefit from tailored treatment. Current strategies include the use of radial access, optimized anticoagulation, appropriate selection of antiplatelet therapy, newer-generation drug-eluting stents, and shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy in selected HBR patients. We also discuss the management of patients with atrial fibrillation requiring oral anticoagulation, as well as those with anemia or thrombocytopenia. Although significant progress has been made, several questions remain unanswered, particularly regarding transfusion thresholds, antithrombotic therapy in complex patients, and the best balance between bleeding and ischemic risks. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to provide further evidence and help improve the management of patients undergoing PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.