Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42514052›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2026

Assessment of Stability of Preservation Techniques for Strawberry Soil Microbiomes: Exploring the Biotechnological Relevance for Sustainable Agriculture.

Federico Sbarra, Marco Garello, Andrea Visca, Filippo Sevi, Francesco Aloi, Silvia Tabacchioni, Manuela Costanzo, Luciana Di Gregorio, Eleonora Colantoni, Lorenzo Nolfi and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Federico SbarraDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-3760-1153
Marco GarelloDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1607-4149
Andrea ViscaDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1795-3532
Filippo SeviDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.
Francesco AloiDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0876-0763
Silvia TabacchioniDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0479-5168
Manuela CostanzoDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.
Luciana Di GregorioDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6811-992X
Eleonora ColantoniDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1301-2492
Lorenzo NolfiDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-8278-1018
Samuel MondyInstitut Agro Dijon, Agroécologie, INRAE, Université Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9203-6398
Luca Simone CocolinDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4799-7074
Davide SpadaroDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5207-9345
Giovanna Cristina VareseDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology (DBIOS), University of Turin, Viale Mattioli, 25, 10125 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1455-6208
Annamaria BevivinoDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4277-7048

Funding

European Union-NextGeneration EU, M4C2, PNRR SUS-MIRRI.IT IR0000005National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR) of the European Union, M4C2, AGRITECH CN00000022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preserving ex situ soil microbial communities is essential for bacterial biodiversity conservation in microbiome biobanking, accurate microbiome research, and future biotechnological applications in sustainable agriculture. The effect of three soil preservation methods-cryopreservation at -80 °C, refrigeration at 4 °C, and lyophilization-on the viability, diversity and metabolic functionality of the soil microbiome was evaluated using soil from untreated and solarized strawberry fields stored at 0, 6 and 12 months. Microbial viability, ecological strategies, functionality, and diversity were assessed using plate counts, r/K strategist profiling, BIOLOG EcoPlates, and 16S rRNA/ITS gene amplicon-based sequencing, respectively. Cryopreservation outperformed the other preservation strategies by generally maintaining total bacterial counts, especially in control soil, preserving the balance between oligotrophic and copiotrophic communities, and sustaining high alpha diversity indices over 12 months. Refrigeration provided moderate preservation, though microbial viability and community stability declined over time. In contrast, lyophilization significantly reduced microbial abundance, altered community composition, and diminished metabolic diversity and substrate utilization. Beta diversity analyses confirmed that cryopreserved samples remained similar in microbial structure to the initial timepoint, while lyophilized samples diverged substantially. Functional analyses also revealed reduced metabolic activity in lyophilized soils, underscoring the negative impact on the microbiome's ecological roles. Overall, the results of this study identify cryopreservation as the most effective storage method for maintaining soil microbiome integrity, providing critical guidance for preserving soil samples in microbiome research and sustainable agricultural biotechnology.

Indexed as

metabolic fingerprintingmicrobial community stabilitymicrobiome biobankingsample preservationsoil microbiome

Identifiers

PMID42514052
PMCPMC13414444

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.