ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Analgosedation in Neonatal Intensive Care: Current Strategies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain and stress are frequent and clinically relevant challenges in neonatal intensive care, particularly among preterm and critically ill newborns exposed to repeated invasive procedures, mechanical ventilation, surgery, and advanced life-support interventions. Effective analgosedation is essential to reduce discomfort, attenuate physiological instability, improve tolerance of intensive care procedures, and potentially limit adverse neurodevelopmental consequences. However, neonatal pain and analgosedation management remain complex because of developmental immaturity, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability, and the need to balance adequate analgosedation against treatment-related complications. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on analgosedation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, focusing on clinical indications, pharmacological agents, non-pharmacological strategies, monitoring tools, adverse effects, and future perspectives. Opioids, benzodiazepines, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine each have specific potential benefits and limitations, requiring individualized selection, careful titration, and continuous reassessment. Non-pharmacological interventions, including oral sucrose, non-nutritive sucking, facilitated tucking, breastfeeding, skin-to-skin care, and environmental modulation, should be integrated into multimodal pain-management protocols. Validated instruments such as COMFORTneo, N-PASS, and PIPP-R support standardized assessment and guide therapeutic decisions. Future advances may derive from objective monitoring technologies, artificial intelligence, developmental pharmacology, and precision-medicine approaches. A multidisciplinary, protocol-driven, and family-centered strategy is essential to optimize neonatal comfort while minimizing avoidable drug exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.