ReviewNutrients2026
Psychiatric Symptoms Associated with Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: A Focused Narrative Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), even though it is a term defined for more than four decades, is still an enigmatic clinical entity. This is primarily due to the absence of specific diagnostic criteria, with most reports relying on patients' self-diagnosis. Individuals with NCGS experience intestinal (abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, or constipation) and extraintestinal symptoms ("foggy mind," depression, anxiety, and deterioration of psychiatric conditions) after gluten consumption. Frequent disregard and oversight of extraintestinal manifestations, such as psychiatric symptoms, further complicates NCGS. The lack of understanding about NCGS causes individuals living with this condition to experience distress, frustration, and stigmatization. An impaired intestinal barrier, gut dysbiosis, and alterations in the gut-brain axis are proposed as key factors in the NCGS and psychiatric symptoms associated with NCGS. None of these links are yet definitive, and the methodological limitations of existing studies-small samples, self-reported diagnoses, and insufficient blinding-demand that conclusions be drawn with appropriate restraint. The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date understanding of the pathophysiology of NCGS and psychiatric symptoms associated with NCGS. Future studies should focus on development of reliable, objective diagnostic markers for NCGS and on the design of adequately powered, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that incorporate validated psychiatric outcome measures alongside intestinal indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.