ReviewNutrients2026
Vitamin C-Beyond Deficiency: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, Formulation and Dosing Considerations, and Safety Across Stress-Responsive Conditions.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) is an essential micronutrient involved in collagen biosynthesis, redox regulation, immune function, endothelial biology, carnitine synthesis, neurotransmitter metabolism, and non-heme iron absorption. Dietary reference values are designed primarily to prevent deficiency in general populations, but vulnerability to low-vitamin C status may increase during trauma, surgery, chronic inflammation, malignancy, metabolic disease, smoking, poor intake, environmental exposure, and tissue repair. This narrative review synthesizes mechanistic, pharmacokinetic, clinical, and safety evidence on vitamin C as a stress-responsive micronutrient. Evidence is reviewed across tissue repair and wound healing, orthopedic recovery and selected complex regional pain syndrome risk contexts, fatigue, neuropsychiatric vulnerability, cancer-supportive care, vascular homeostasis, dermatologic biology, and preliminary microbiota-gut-brain axis hypotheses. The strength of evidence differs substantially across domains: biochemical functions and deficiency correction are well established, whereas benefits of supraphysiologic oral supplementation in vitamin C-replete patients remain uncertain. Oral nutritional supplementation is distinguished from intravenous pharmacologic ascorbate, with attention to route, formulation, dose division, gastrointestinal tolerance-limited adjustment, and safety monitoring. Because evidence for high-dose oral supplementation remains limited and condition-specific, such use should be individualized, time-limited, and clinician-monitored rather than presented as a population-level recommendation or evidence-defined therapeutic target. Taken together, the clinical value of vitamin C depends on baseline status, patient vulnerability, route, formulation, dosing interval, clinical endpoint, and safety review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.