ReviewNutrients2026
Common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Clinical Cardiology and Dietary Intervention: A Narrative Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic testing for rare, highly penetrant cardiovascular pathogenic mutations is well established, but its scarcity limits broader clinical utility. As cardiogenomics matures, common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are increasingly accessible to clinicians and patients through both clinician-ordered and direct-to-consumer (DTC) platforms. This narrative review synthesizes evidence for six common loci-APOA1, APOE, LIPC, LPL, ANGPTL3, and FADS1/2, here termed "candidate-actionable" in the limited sense that genotype-by-diet associations have been described, but the full chain of analytical validity, clinical validity, clinical utility, and evidence-supported management has not been demonstrated-that modulate lipid metabolism and CVD risk and that show genotype-by-diet interactions in observational and small interventional studies. We frame these loci as complementary to validated polygenic risk scores (PRSs), discuss two illustrative epistatic axes (APOE ε4 × FADS major T-allele; ANGPTL3 × LPL), summarize emerging epigenetic modulators of the same loci, and propose an integrated framework combining PRS, locus-level SNPs, and epigenetic state. All locus-specific dietary considerations are explicitly framed as hypothesis-generating pending validation in adequately powered, genotype-stratified prospective trials. A comparison of consumer and clinical testing platforms-updated to reflect recent ownership and regulatory changes-is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.