ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Infrared Thermography and Machine Learning for Mastitis Detection in Dairy Cows: A Pilot Case Study in Egyptian Farms.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mastitis is a major and costly dairy disease that reduces milk yield and quality and harms animal welfare. This study evaluated infrared thermography (IRT) combined with machine learning (ML) for non-invasive mastitis screening in dairy cows and explored links with biological and feeding-system variables in Egyptian farms. A total of 976 thermal udder images obtained from 488 Holstein cows were used, including 708 healthy and 268 mastitic images. Images were captured before milking, processed with CLAHE, resized to 224 × 224 pixels, and split using cow-level grouping before augmentation to prevent animal-level data leakage. The training set contained 780 original images and was augmented to a balanced 4708-image set (2354 per class), while the held-out test set remained unaugmented, with 196 original images (142 healthy and 54 mastitic). EfficientNetB3 with global average and max pooling extracted 3072 thermal features, and ten ML classifiers were evaluated. In the image-level hold-out evaluation, MLP achieved the best performance (accuracy = 86.22%, AUC = 0.9184, sensitivity = 74.07%, specificity = 90.85%), followed by SVM (accuracy = 83.67%, AUC = 0.8963). A separate group-based five-fold cross-validation yielded a more conservative AUC of 0.6812 ± 0.1323 and accuracy of 0.6244 ± 0.0642. Logistic regression analyses did not identify statistically significant associations between model predictions and somatic cell count (SCC), California Mastitis Test (CMT), blood biomarkers, or nutritional variables at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.