ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Protein-Based Nanomaterials for Cancer Therapy: A Comparative and Translational Perspective.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, the use of nanomaterials and nanomedical devices has been increasingly explored for cancer treatment. Although the outcomes of conventional therapies have improved patient survival, these approaches still present important limitations for some types of cancer and metastasis. Challenges such as poor drug accumulation in solid tumors and lack of specificity and selectivity can be addressed through alternative nanomedicine-based treatments. Among the wide range of nanoplatforms whose composition and shape have been designed for cancer treatment, this review focuses specifically on those based on natural proteins, including advanced carriers and engineered proteins bearing active targeting and/or therapeutic agents. The objective of this review is to provide a comparative and translational analysis of protein-based nanomaterials for cancer therapy, highlighting their unique characteristics, such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and the ability to integrate bioactive peptides that can trigger or respond to tumor-specific or altered physiological stimuli. Several protein-based nanomedical devices have been developed for theranostic applications, demonstrating enhanced performance in tumor imaging and cancer treatment. This review introduces a structured analytical framework that classifies protein-based nanomaterials according to their biological origin, functional design, and clinical readiness, enabling systematic evaluation across platforms. Rather than providing a descriptive overview, this work offers a structured comparative analysis of protein-based nanomaterials, highlighting design trade-offs, translational challenges, and factors influencing clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.