ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Feature-Level Fusion of Surface Electromyography and Mechanomyography Signals for MVC-Normalized Shoulder Abduction Force-Level Classification in Healthy Adults.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate recognition of upper-limb force levels is important for wearable movement monitoring and rehabilitation engineering, yet the value of combining surface electromyography (sEMG) and mechanomyography (MMG) for shoulder force classification remains incompletely characterized.
methodsTen healthy adults performed right shoulder abduction at four maximum voluntary contraction (MVC)-normalized force levels of approximately 10%, 30%, 60%, and 90% MVC. Signals were synchronously collected from the middle deltoid at 1000 Hz and segmented using 500 ms windows with a 150 ms stride. The evaluated classifiers were logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree (DT), support vector machine with a radial basis function kernel (SVM-RBF), random forest (RF), extremely randomized trees (ET), histogram-based gradient boosting decision tree (HGBDT), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Models were evaluated using group-aware five-fold cross-validation at the action-trial level.
resultsThe dataset contained 12,231 windows from 30 action-trial groups. HGBDT achieved the best performance, with an accuracy of 0.904±0.023, macro-F1 score of 0.911±0.018, quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.910±0.038, and mean absolute grade error of 0.137±0.042. Fusion increased macro-F1 from 0.821±0.030 for sEMG-only and 0.771±0.015 for MMG-only to 0.911±0.018.
conclusionsThese internally validated findings support the complementary value of sEMG and MMG for MVC-normalized shoulder force-level classification in healthy adults. Subject-independent and patient-level validation is required before clinical rehabilitation use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.