ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
From Sensors to Systems: Real-Time Human Performance and Health Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable and environmental sensors are increasingly used to monitor human performance and health in real time, but their practical value remains limited when signals are interpreted in isolation or through context-independent algorithms. This Perspective focuses on real-time physiological monitoring in elite sport, using exertional heat illness risk and physiological strain as a high-stakes worked example. Our work further illustrates how such monitoring could move from device-level measurement toward fit-for-purpose sensor ecosystems. We argue that such ecosystems should be defined not by multimodal data collection alone, but by five core pillars: time-synchronised sensing, context-specific interpretation, multi-level validation, uncertainty-aware modelling and embedded governance-each evaluated against a defined high-stakes decision rather than device accuracy alone. Accurate decision-making in this context may require integration of thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, biomechanical and environmental data streams. Emerging artificial intelligence approaches may support prediction and decision support, but only if models are transparent, calibrated, prospectively validated and robust to individual and contextual variability. We also examine unresolved risks, including algorithmic bias, false reassurance, athlete surveillance, proprietary opacity, data asymmetry and regulatory constraints. While the framework and evidence presented here are anchored in elite sport, we discuss where its core validation and governance principles may extend to clinical, occupational and military settings, and where the underlying evidence remains sport-specific. The proposed framework is intended to complement, rather than replace, existing digital health, athlete management and cyber-physical systems by specifying the validation and governance requirements needed for high-stakes human performance monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.