ReviewAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026
The Price of Precision: A Critical Review of Molecular Diagnostics in Glioma, From Guidelines to Global Disparities.
Review in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gliomas have undergone a profound redefinition over the past decade, transitioning from morphology-based entities to biologically coherent diseases defined by molecular alterations. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System and its 2022 update formalize this shift, establishing integrated diagnosis as the global standard and identifying essential biomarkers-including IDH mutations, 1p/19q codeletion, ATRX loss, TP53 mutation, TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, and +7/-10 cytogenetics-that shape prognosis, therapeutic decision-making, and clinical trial eligibility. In this review, we synthesize the current molecular taxonomy of gliomas and compare recommendations from major international guidelines (WHO, NCCN, EANO) and the Italian Association of Neuro-Oncology (AINO). Recognizing that contemporary practice employs a complementary, purpose-driven array of diagnostic modalities-from immunohistochemistry and PCR-based methods to next-generation sequencing and DNA methylation profiling-we critically examine the profound global disparities that hinder implementation, focusing on economic constraints, infrastructural limitations, regulatory barriers, and workforce shortages. By integrating health-economic evidence, we demonstrate that the societal and financial burden of non-implementation far exceeds the investment required for molecular testing. We propose a tiered implementation framework in which clinically actionable information is obtainable for most glioma patients through accessible, cost-effective technologies, with more resource-intensive modalities reserved for specific clinical scenarios. Ensuring equitable access to integrated diagnostics, defined as the right test for the right clinical question, is essential not only for precision neuro-oncology but also for global healthcare justice and scientific progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.