ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Retinol-binding protein 3 in ophthalmology: current evidence, research progress, and future perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinol-binding protein 3 (RBP3) is a photoreceptor-derived glyco-lipoprotein that plays a central role in retinoid trafficking between photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium. Beyond its canonical role in the visual cycle, emerging evidence suggests that RBP3 may participate in retinal metabolic regulation, neurovascular protection, inflammatory modulation, and disease-related immune responses. This review critically summarizes current evidence regarding RBP3 in diabetic retinopathy, retinal degeneration, pathological myopia, primary congenital glaucoma, and uveitis. Among these conditions, diabetic retinopathy has the most extensive evidence base, including clinical association studies, proteomic analyses, and preclinical intervention experiments. However, most clinical studies remain correlational, and RBP3-based therapeutic strategies have not yet been validated in human interventional trials. In other diseases, such as primary congenital glaucoma and uveitis, the current evidence is more limited and is largely derived from proteomics or animal models. Therefore, RBP3 should currently be regarded as a promising but incompletely validated biomarker and therapeutic candidate. Future studies should clarify disease-stage-specific roles, receptor-mediated mechanisms, safety profiles, and clinical utility through large-scale prospective and mechanistic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.