ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Geriatric syndromes extraction from discharge summaries: a new dataset, annotation scheme and initial findings.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Geriatric syndromes (GS), such as falls, dementia, delirium and malnutrition, are complex clinical conditions affecting older adults which involve multiple organ systems and have major impact on quality of life and care. GS cut across disease categories, and are poorly represented in structured electronic health records. Natural language processing (NLP) offers an opportunity to extract valuable GS-related information from unstructured clinical text, such as hospital discharge summaries. However, the lack of high-quality annotated datasets limits the effectiveness of NLP models in this domain. This study introduces a manually annotated corpus designed for GS detection, enabling more accurate identification and classification of GS. Methods: We developed a comprehensive and detailed annotation scheme to label 12 common GS from hospital discharge summaries, incorporating key attributes such as diagnosis type, negation and event occurrence. The corpus consists of 2,040 manually annotated discharge summaries from National Health Service (NHS) Lothian hospitals in Scotland. To assess the effectiveness of NLP in extracting GS, we experimented with multiple pretrained transformer-based models, including base BERT (general-domain), BioBERT (biomedical-domain), BioClinicalBERT (clinical-domain) and BERT-cased (the cased English BERT checkpoint). The models were fine-tuned and tested for two types of tasks: named entity recognition (NER) and document-level labelling. We also considered an extra task of detecting contextual information with each GS mention (e.g., history, suspected, in-hospital). When context information is considered, two new tasks are called NER-C and DL-C, for NER and document-level labelling with context respectively. Results: Our evaluation showed that, for the document-level labelling task, BERT-cased achieved the highest F1-score (0.897) and BioClinicalBERT performed best when negation was considered (F1-score: 0.888). For the NER task, BioClinicalBERT and BERT-cased achieved an F1-score of 0.883. Frailty (F1 Discussion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of NLP for extracting geriatric syndromes from unstructured clinical text and introduces a manually annotated corpus with detailed guidelines to support this task. The results also show that model performance is strongly shaped by dataset characteristics. More frequent and lexically clearer syndromes, such as frailty, falls and delirium, achieved the strongest results, whereas rarer categories and low-frequency attribute combinations, such as suspected, referral and some negated or context-specific labels, were harder to learn and yielded lower and less stable scores. Likewise, fine-grained annotation was more challenging than coarse-grained annotation because it increases label sparsity and requires the model to distinguish subtle contextual differences, such as current vs. historical mentions, implicit mentions and in-hospital onset. Entity-level extraction was further affected by discontinuous and overlapping mentions, which are common in clinical narratives and make boundary detection harder, whereas document-level aggregation reduced the impact of these local errors and therefore produced higher scores. These findings underline that data distribution, annotation complexity and mention structure directly influence model performance, and should be central considerations in future work on geriatric syndrome extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.