Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516531›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

The social phenomenon of rare diseases: a logical-modal analysis.

Enrique Fernández-Vilas, Juan R Coca, Nicolás Plaza-Gómez, Fernando Soler Toscano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Enrique Fernández-VilasUniversity of Valladolid, Soria, Spain.
Juan R CocaUniversity of Valladolid, Soria, Spain.
Nicolás Plaza-GómezUniversity of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Fernando Soler ToscanoUniversity of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the social phenomenon of rare diseases through a logical-modal analysis. Although rare diseases originate within a biomedical framework and are increasingly recognised by institutional and empirical literature as issues of equity, inclusion, care and participation, this recognition has not usually been formalised in Durkheimian terms. The study applies modal logic, based on possible-worlds semantics and Kripke models, to clarify the conditions under which rare diseases acquire the status of social facts. By modelling behavioural change, coercion, generality and existence independent of individual manifestations, it shows how rare diseases transcend isolated clinical cases and impose structured constraints on social roles, families, institutions and policies. Empirical illustrations from international policy, employment studies, caregiver research and participation surveys are used to anchor the modal variables without treating the model as a statistical validation. The analysis argues that the transition from fragmented recognition to consolidated social fact depends on collective action, institutionalisation and normative recognition. The formalisation identifies intermediate configurations and a stabilised threshold state in which rare diseases become durable and socially binding within the model.

Indexed as

Durkheiminstitutionalizationmodal logicpolicies of recognitionrare diseasessocial facts

Identifiers

PMID42516531
PMCPMC13402142

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.