Evidence mapPaperPMID 42516544Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2026

Toxicological safety profiling of

Abanti Goswami, Vara Prasad Saka, Mahima Sharma, Narasimha Kumar G V, Pankaj Gupta, Digvijay Verma, Subhash Kaushik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abanti GoswamiDepartment of Pharmacology, Drug Standardization, Dr. Anjali Chatterji Regional Research Institute for Homoeopathy, Under Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Ministry of Ayush, Kolkata, West Bengal 700035, India.
Vara Prasad SakaDepartment of Pharmacology, Drug Standardization, Dr. Anjali Chatterji Regional Research Institute for Homoeopathy, Under Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Ministry of Ayush, Kolkata, West Bengal 700035, India.
Mahima SharmaDepartment of Pharmacology, Drug Standardization, Dr. D P Rastogi Central Research Institute for Homoeopathy, Under Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Ministry of Ayush, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India.
Narasimha Kumar G VDepartment of Pharmacology, Drug Standardization, Dr. Anjali Chatterji Regional Research Institute for Homoeopathy, Under Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Ministry of Ayush, Kolkata, West Bengal 700035, India.
Pankaj GuptaDepartment of Pharmacology, Drug Standardization, Dr. D P Rastogi Central Research Institute for Homoeopathy, Under Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Ministry of Ayush, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301, India.
Digvijay VermaDrug Standardization Department, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Ministry of Ayush, New Delhi 110058, India.
Subhash KaushikDirector General, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Ministry of Ayush, Government of India, Janakpuri, New Delhi 110058, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The hydroethanolic extract of Objectives: This study aimed to establish a comprehensive preclinical safety profile of BV using Methods: Phytochemical profiling was conducted using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS). Acute and 28-day repeated-dose oral toxicity studies were performed in Wistar rats following OECD guidelines 423 and 407, respectively. Developmental toxicity was assessed in zebrafish embryos (OECD 236), and Results: LC-MS analysis identified 22 bioactive chemical components. In the acute oral toxicity study, BV administered at 2000 µL/kg caused no mortality or toxicity, indicating an LD₅₀ > 2000 µL/kg. The 28-day repeated-dose study showed no significant alterations in haematological, biochemical, or histological parameters at doses up to 1000 µL/kg/day, establishing a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of ≥ 1000 µL/kg/day. While lower concentrations were safe in zebrafish, high concentrations (4 µL/2 ml) induced developmental abnormalities such as scoliosis and pericardial edema. Computational analysis predicted low-to-moderate toxicity for the majority of phytoconstituents. Conclusion: BV exhibits a wide safety margin in rodent models and is non-toxic at therapeutically relevant doses. However, observed developmental effects in zebrafish suggest caution at high concentrations, supporting the need for adherence to recommended dosages in traditional therapeutic contexts.

Indexed as

Acute toxicityBerberis vulgarisIn silico toxicologyLC–MS profilingRepeated-dose toxicityZebrafish embryo toxicity

Identifiers

PMID42516544
PMCPMC13403928

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.