ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2026
Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation vs. Standard Care in Pediatric CNS Tumor Survivors: A National Cohort Study from Kazakhstan.
Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Childhood survivors of CNS tumors are at high risk for long-term neurological, cognitive, and functional impairments. In Kazakhstan and many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), standardized rehabilitation services and outcome tracking systems are largely lacking. To assess the effectiveness of Kazakhstan's inaugural national multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for children with CNS tumors, utilizing data from a newly established pediatric oncology registry. Methods: This retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up included 600 children aged 3-17 years with CNS tumors. The intervention group (n=300) received structured rehabilitation, which encompassed physiotherapy, physical education, speech therapy, neuropsychological therapy, psychological support, hippotherapy, sensory integration, and occupational therapy. The control group (n=300) received standard post-treatment follow-up without rehabilitation. Outcomes were assessed using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), the OncoLife caregiver questionnaire, and neuropsychological testing. During the study period, standard care in Kazakhstan included routine oncological follow-up visits, symptom-driven neurological consultations, and general medical management. However, structured multidisciplinary rehabilitation services were not systematically available. Results: All children in the intervention group completed the rehabilitation program without experiencing serious adverse events. Compared to the control group, the rehabilitation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in functional independence (+14.23 PEDI points), quality of life (+20.04 PedsQL points), caregiver-reported outcomes (+15.23 OncoLife points), and cognitive performance (+17.75 neuropsychological points) (all Conclusion: The national implementation of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for pediatric CNS tumor survivors in Kazakhstan has significantly improved health and functional outcomes without raising safety concerns. These findings advocate for the integration of rehabilitation into pediatric oncology care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.