ReviewMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2026
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Admission Status, Intensive Care Requirements, and Mortality in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Predicting patient outcomes in the emergency department is crucial for effective resource management and enhancing the quality of care. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have facilitated accurate predictions of patient outcomes; however, consistent evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of these models in the emergency department remains limited. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in predicting admission status, intensive care requirements, and in-hospital mortality in the emergency department. Methods: In the present study, the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2020 to November 2025 using targeted keywords. A total of 34 relevant studies were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata v.17 software. Results: The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the models for predicting admission were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.93) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.95), respectively. For critical care, sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.57-1.00) and specificity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.57-1.00). For mortality, sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.60-1.00) and specificity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.67-1.00). Conclusion: Artificial intelligence models, encompassing both machine learning and deep learning, serve as effective tools for predicting the conditions of emergency patients. The findings indicate that AI holds significant potential to enhance clinical decision-making within the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.