ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026
Bayesian analysis of the early cold stored platelet transfusion following severe injury randomized clinical trial.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Early Cold Stored Platelet Transfusion Following Severe Trauma Injury Trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of cold stored platelet (CSP) transfusion in injured patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock. It was a phase II, multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted from June 2022 to September 2023 at five US level 1 trauma centers. A total of 200 adult patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock (102 CSP, 98 standard care (SC)) were included. Median age was 34±13 years, 85% were males, and injury severity was similar between groups. The original frequentist analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in 24-hour mortality between CSP (5.9%) transfusion and SC (10.2%, p=0.28). Methods: To provide further insight into these findings, a Bayesian logistic regression outcome model with an uninformative prior was performed. To validate the findings further, a sensitivity analysis was performed in addition to analysis using a beta-binomial Bayesian model. Results: The Bayesian logistic regression model yielded an 89.1% posterior probability that CSP transfusion reduced 24-hour mortality (ß Conclusion: These findings suggest a high likelihood of mortality benefit with early CSP transfusion in injured patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock and illustrate the added interpretive value of Bayesian analysis in trauma trials with low event rates. Level of evidence: Level II-therapeutic/care management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.