ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Community-informed trial design and implementation to optimize recruitment and retention in low-income settings: lessons from rheumatic heart disease trials in Uganda.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research teams undertaking randomized clinical trials in low-and middle-income countries frequently encounter significant challenges, including limited infrastructure, cultural barriers to trust, and limited resources. Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) trials can be especially difficult because early stages of RHD often show no symptoms, there is low disease awareness among healthcare workers and the public, pediatric heart disease is often stigmatized, and disease management requires burdensome secondary antibiotic prophylaxis. To address these challenges, the RHD Research Collaborative in Uganda (RRCU) partnered with community members to establish a community-centered framework for trial design and implementation that incorporates group-based consent, frequent and personalized communication, and convenient, family-friendly participation structures. These components have been successfully adapted and applied across a series of RRCU studies, contributing to exceptionally high rates of consent, retention, and prophylaxis adherence. The RRCU's community-informed approach to trial design and implementation challenges assumptions about research feasibility in low-resource settings and demonstrates that high-quality, ethical pediatric research can be successfully conducted by engaging communities and integrating their values into all aspects of study design and execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.