ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy of electroacupuncture in the treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06869525 (Study on the Efficacy and Mechanism of Acupuncture in the Acute Stage of Chronic Airway Diseases), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study on the Efficacy and Mechanism of Acupuncture in the Acute Stage of Chronic Airway Diseases (Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. Recurrent acute exacerbations severely impact patients' quality of life and impose a significant economic burden. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy for patients with advanced COPD. However, evidence regarding its efficacy during the acute exacerbation phase remains insufficient, particularly from high-quality clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in treating patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), establish a standardized electroacupuncture treatment protocol for AECOPD, and preliminarily explore the association between electroacupuncture and airway mucus hypersecretion. Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial. A total of 336 eligible patients with AECOPD will be recruited and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either an electroacupuncture group or a sham acupuncture group. Participants will receive treatment once daily for 7 consecutive days and will then be followed up for 13 weeks. The primary outcome measure is the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Secondary outcomes include the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q), the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC), clinical symptom and sign scores, the number of exacerbations, and arterial blood gas. All rating scales will be evaluated at baseline, 4 days after treatment, 7 days after treatment, 5 weeks of follow-up and 13 weeks of follow-up. Arterial blood gas analysis and alveolar lavage fluid collection will be performed at baseline and after 7 days of treatment. The number of acute exacerbations during the follow-up period will be recorded at 5 and 13 weeks of follow-up. Adverse events related to acupuncture will be recorded throughout the study period. Conclusion: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in treating patients with AECOPD, establish a standardized electroacupuncture treatment protocol for AECOPD, and preliminarily explore the association between electroacupuncture and airway mucus hypersecretion. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT06869525].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.