ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Identification of hidden subtypes in occupational health examinations and their biomedical characteristics using graph-enhanced deep representation learning.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Occupational health examinations have long relied on conventional health classes to assess worker health status. However, individuals within the same examination class may differ substantially in risk sources, pathophysiological background, and potential progression patterns. This study aimed to determine whether stable hidden health subtypes exist beyond conventional occupational health classifications in a large real-world cohort and to evaluate the utility of graph-enhanced deep representation learning for subtype discovery and biomedical interpretation. Methods: We included 63,988 occupational health examination records collected from five organizational units between 2022 and 2025. A standardized master dataset was constructed by harmonizing anthropometric measures, blood pressure, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, liver function, kidney function, inflammatory markers, and vascular-related indicators. We first established a benchmark panel including conventional statistical models, tree-based models, and neural network models. We then developed a domain-aware prototype tabular network (DAPTN) and its graph-enhanced variant (Graph-DAPTN) to learn individual-level latent health representations, prototype distances, and hidden subtype structure. The identified subtypes were further interpreted in terms of clinical abnormality burden, risk gradients, temporal drift, and cross-domain stability. Results: The cohort exhibited substantial heterogeneity across units and years, as well as strong coupling among biomedical indicators. Linear models showed limited performance in capturing complex occupational health phenotypes, whereas nonlinear models performed better overall. In subtype-discovery validation, Graph-DAPTN showed stronger cluster separation and class-subtype concordance than several conventional baselines. Based on this representation, six clinically interpretable hidden subtypes were identified beyond conventional health classes: resilient-healthy, hepato-inflammatory, uric-metabolic, gluco-lipotoxic, hypertensive-homocysteine, and ageing-vascular. These subtypes showed distinct abnormality spectra in glucose and lipid metabolism, blood pressure, liver enzymes, uric acid, homocysteine, and inflammatory burden, and their distributions varied across years and organizational units. Conclusion: Conventional health classes in occupational health examinations do not fully capture the underlying heterogeneity of worker health status. Graph-enhanced deep representation learning can improve health-state modeling while identifying clinically meaningful hidden subtypes beneath routine classification. These findings may support more refined risk stratification, key-population screening, and unit-level health intervention planning in occupational health practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.