SynthesisCell transplantation
Stem cell and extracellular vesicle therapies for wound healing: An umbrella review of predominantly diabetic and preclinical evidence.
Synthesis in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic and complex skin wounds, including diabetic ulcers and burns, represent a major clinical challenge with substantial morbidity and healthcare costs. Regenerative approaches have evolved from stem cell-based therapies toward stem cell-free strategies, particularly mesenchymal stroma/stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs). However, the relative strength, consistency, and translational readiness of these approaches remain unclear. The aim of this study is to synthesize and critically appraise evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cell-based and cell-free regenerative therapies for wound healing, with emphasis on clinical relevance, methodological quality, and recent developments. An umbrella review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English within the last 5 years. Eligible reviews evaluated cell-based therapies and/or extracellular vesicle-based interventions for skin wound healing in clinical and/or animal models. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, and overlap of primary studies was evaluated using the corrected covered area (CCA). Seven systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, encompassing both clinical and preclinical evidence. Notably, the majority of included evidence was derived from diabetic wound models, particularly in preclinical animal studies. Cell-based therapies demonstrated clinically relevant benefits in specific settings, such as autologous skin cell suspensions for burns and biologic skin substitutes for diabetic foot ulcers, although certainty of evidence was low to moderate. In contrast, MSC-EVs showed large and consistent effects on wound closure, angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and inflammatory modulation in preclinical models. No randomized human trials of EV-based wound therapies were identified. Current evidence suggests a paradigm shift toward stem cell-free regenerative strategies in wound healing. While cell therapies have limited but established clinical roles, MSC-EVs offer strong preclinical efficacy and translational potential. Standardization, regulatory alignment, and well-designed clinical trials are required to enable safe clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.