Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42517600›Full record

SynthesisCell transplantation

Stem cell and extracellular vesicle therapies for wound healing: An umbrella review of predominantly diabetic and preclinical evidence.

Nadiar M Mussin, Amin Tamadon, Mahdi Mahdipour, Kulyash R Zhilisbayeva, Madina A Kurmanalina, Akmaral Baspakova, Mustafa R Rysuly, Amirkan A Azimbayev, Vyacheslav B Ogay, Ramazon Safarzoda Sharoffidin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nadiar M MussinDepartment of General Surgery No. 2, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan.
Amin TamadonDepartment of Natural Sciences, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-0222-3035
Mahdi MahdipourStem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Kulyash R ZhilisbayevaDepartment of Languages, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-4840-3648
Madina A KurmanalinaDepartment of Dental Disciplines and Maxillofacial Surgery, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-6934-3541
Akmaral BaspakovaDepartment of Epidemiology, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan.
Mustafa R RysulyKazakh Scientific Center of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Amirkan A AzimbayevScientific Center for Anti-Infectious Drugs, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Vyacheslav B OgayLaboratory of Stem Cells, National Center for Biotechnology LLP, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-5029-5255
Ramazon Safarzoda SharoffidinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9304-6945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic and complex skin wounds, including diabetic ulcers and burns, represent a major clinical challenge with substantial morbidity and healthcare costs. Regenerative approaches have evolved from stem cell-based therapies toward stem cell-free strategies, particularly mesenchymal stroma/stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs). However, the relative strength, consistency, and translational readiness of these approaches remain unclear. The aim of this study is to synthesize and critically appraise evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cell-based and cell-free regenerative therapies for wound healing, with emphasis on clinical relevance, methodological quality, and recent developments. An umbrella review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English within the last 5 years. Eligible reviews evaluated cell-based therapies and/or extracellular vesicle-based interventions for skin wound healing in clinical and/or animal models. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, and overlap of primary studies was evaluated using the corrected covered area (CCA). Seven systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, encompassing both clinical and preclinical evidence. Notably, the majority of included evidence was derived from diabetic wound models, particularly in preclinical animal studies. Cell-based therapies demonstrated clinically relevant benefits in specific settings, such as autologous skin cell suspensions for burns and biologic skin substitutes for diabetic foot ulcers, although certainty of evidence was low to moderate. In contrast, MSC-EVs showed large and consistent effects on wound closure, angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and inflammatory modulation in preclinical models. No randomized human trials of EV-based wound therapies were identified. Current evidence suggests a paradigm shift toward stem cell-free regenerative strategies in wound healing. While cell therapies have limited but established clinical roles, MSC-EVs offer strong preclinical efficacy and translational potential. Standardization, regulatory alignment, and well-designed clinical trials are required to enable safe clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesStem CellsWound HealingAnimalsHumansMesenchymal Stem Cellsdiabetic foot ulcerextracellular vesiclesmesenchymal stem cellsregenerative medicinewound healing

Identifiers

PMID42517600
PMCPMC13420067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.